Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

Product test

How much should a smartphone cost? The Nokia C12 feels too retro

Jan Johannsen
28.4.2023
Translation: Katherine Martin

How much does a cheap smartphone need to cost for me to like it? In a bid to find out, I try the Nokia C12 – a new model that still manages to feel old.

Removable back? Check. Replaceable battery? Check. Headphone jack? Check. One solitary camera? Check. Smartphones don’t have to be expensive to be decent. So which inexpensive smartphones out there meet the minimum requirements? Which ones can I recommend with a clear conscience? I kick off my search with the Nokia C12, which comes in at a recommended retail price of 119 euros/francs.

Nice back, display A-OK

At 1600 × 720 pixels, the resolution is low, but the pixel density of 278 ppi is still close to the 300-ppi limit. Above that figure, the human eye can’t discern any difference in sharpness when viewing the display from a typical distance, i.e. when holding the smartphone comfortably. This puts the Nokia C12 just within the limit.

It’s unusual that Nokia has decided to do without a fingerprint sensor on the C12. As well as password or PIN entry, I can also conveniently unlock the phone via facial recognition. It works a bit slower than on more expensive smartphones, but it recognises me reliably.

A smartphone that demands patience

The Nokia C12 has a modest internal memory of 64 gigabytes, but it can be expanded with a microSD card. The performance is only sufficient for simple games and the camera doesn’t need much storage space for photos. So despite my typical smartphone habits, I could almost consider the 64 gigabytes acceptable.

Removable battery

The Nokia C12’s 3000 mAh battery is replaceable. You don’t need any tools to change it. Simply take off the back and remove the battery with your fingers. The capacity seems low compared to the typical figure of 5000 mAh. Nevertheless, I make it through the day okay despite the humble hardware. That being said, the C12 doesn’t give you hours of use.

The Nokia C12 is charged via a micro-USB port. This feels like a relic of the past, and isn’t particularly fast. The maximum power is 5 watts. For comparison, the 25-watt Pixel 7 Pro is considered slow, requiring two hours instead of one for a full charge. The Nokia C12 needs a couple more on top of that.

Old ports and standards

It’s not just the micro-USB port that feels outdated, it’s the Wi-Fi standard too. Wi-Fi 4 really is outdated. Another outdated yet still very useful feature is the 3.5 millimetre headphone jack. Wireless headphones can be connected via Bluetooth 5.2 – a modern standard.

It’s also worth mentioning the features Nokia has decided to do without. The C12 doesn’t have NFC, so you can’t use it to make mobile payments. Its location services only use GPS; Galileo and Glonass are both alien concepts to this smartphone.

Android Go? Android Stop, more like

Nokia has installed Android 12 Go on the C12. This is essentially a slimmed-down version of Google’s operating system, designed for cheaper smartphones. It gets by on less memory and occupies less storage space. The same applies to the Go version of several Google apps.

However, Nokia has given the storage space it’s gained from this to six pre-installed third-party apps. Together, they take up 570 megabytes. Although this doesn’t sound like much, you’re only left with 54 gigabytes of the 64 gigabyte storage when you start using the phone.

Not only that, but Android 12 Go isn’t the latest version. Android 13 Go came out in October 2022, several months before Nokia launched the C12. If that wasn’t annoying enough, Nokia doesn’t provide Android updates for the C12. You just get two years of quarterly security updates. In my book, that’s not enough support – even if it is a budget smartphone.

No need for retro filters on this camera

On the back of the Nokia C12, there’s just one 8-megapixel camera. Meanwhile, the front camera takes selfies of just 5 mexapixels. The issue here isn’t the paltry number of cameras, nor is it the single-digit resolution – it’s the quality. When posting your snaps to Insta or other social media channels, you won’t need a retro filter.

Colours and level of detail

No, the camera’s lens wasn’t fogged up. And no, I didn’t forget to take off the protective sticker. Even so, the photo isn’t sharp, and the blurriness progresses as you get closer to the edges. On top of that, the colours seem lacklustre. Hardly a pretty picture.

It’s a sunny day in the park, but neither the blue between the clouds nor the green grass get a chance to shine here. We might as well be looking at a poorly digitalised analogue photo from the 1970s.

Portrait

The Nokia C12’s camera app is equipped with portrait mode. It’s wide-angled and pixelated, with a background just a little less sharp than in automatic mode. It also looks overexposed when compared to me in the shade. Other smartphones often compensate this better via HDR mode.

Nighttime

The camera app even has night mode. However, even that isn’t enough to rescue the quality of images taken in darkness.

Selfies

Looking at the selfie, I’m able to make myself out, as well as the fact I’m in a park. Still, I wouldn’t want to use the image.

Conclusion: a false economy

Sure, the Nokia C12 is a smartphone, but it’s not much fun. Even taking its low price into account, I’m unconvinced by it. The only reason to get it is if you want a smartphone that’ll force you into a digital detox.

Its removable battery and ability to accommodate two SIM cards bags the Nokia C12 some plus points. Plus, I like the plastic back. The display does the job, but the hardware’s too slow. Not getting functional Android updates is disappointing, and the camera doesn’t make me want to take photos.

On the whole, that’s too many drawbacks for me to say, with a clear conscience, that you should get the Nokia C12 if you’re not willing to splash out. If you want a usable smartphone, you’ll need to pay a bit more.

For my next review, I’ll increase the budget by about 60 euros/francs. Let’s see if I get enough bang for my buck with the Motorola Moto G13.

Header image: Jan Johannsen

47 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

When I was but a young student, I'd sit in my friend's living room with all my classmates and play on his SuperNES. Since then I've had the opportunity to test out all the newest technology for you. I've done reviews at Curved, Computer Bild and Netzwelt, and have now arrived at Galaxus.de. 


Product test

Our experts test products and their applications. Independently and neutrally.

Show all

These articles might also interest you

  • Product test

    How much does a smartphone have to cost? The Nokia G60 needs to justify its price

    by Jan Johannsen

  • Product test

    How much should a smartphone cost? The Moto G13 covers a lot of needs

    by Jan Johannsen

  • Product test

    HMD Skyline review: the Lumia design makes a comeback

    by Jan Johannsen