Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

Background information

Do you also have to convert the speed to 35mm format?

David Lee
22.8.2017
Translation: machine translated

The same focal length looks different on different sensor sizes, which is why it is sometimes converted to 35 mm format. Do you also have to do this with the aperture and speed?

The starting point for the idea of converting the light intensity is as follows: If you photograph the same image section with the same aperture using different sensor sizes, the photo will still not look quite the same: the depth of field is different. The unfocussed background is more blurred on the large sensor.

Tony Northrup shows this very nicely in his explanatory video, here is a screenshot of it. You have to pay attention to the window frames in the background:

You can now also offset the f-number with the crop factor in order to achieve a comparable depth of field. Example: APS-C: 75 mm and f/4 corresponds to an image in full format with 112.5 mm focal length and f/6.

So far, so good. But you have to be extremely careful not to draw the wrong conclusions. In particular, you must not confuse the converted values with the real ones.

Full frame camera, 35 mm, f/4.APS-C, same focal length and aperture (35 mm, f/4).Detail of the shot with full-frame camera. The degree of blurring in the background is the same as in the shot with an APS-C camera.

It is also not the case that a lens with a speed of f/4 on a full-frame sensor would then only have a speed of f/6. The real light intensity remains at f/4, it does not change. It is a fixed property of a lens, which is why it is not a marketing gimmick to write this property on the lens.

As is well known, the aperture not only says something about the depth of field, but also how long the exposure can be under certain conditions - and this is the main point when talking about "light intensity".

How strong the exposure is depends on three factors: Exposure time, aperture and ISO sensitivity. If a particular photo is correctly exposed at 1/60th of a second, f/2 and 100 ISO, then that's always the case, regardless of the sensor size and the lens used. If I start to convert the aperture, the exposure is no longer correct.

There are now people who claim that you also have to convert the ISO value, i.e. multiply the crop factor by the square. 1.5 squared is 2.25. In the example above: APS-C: f/2 and 100 ISO corresponds to f/3 and 225 ISO in full format.

This double conversion means that the exposure is correct again. But the whole calculation only relates to the comparability of images, not lenses. A lens with a speed of f/6 (if that even exists) does not have a speed of f/4 on APS-C. It is still f/6.

Conclusion

If you want to use a full-frame lens on an APS-C camera, you must observe the following:

It's best to forget all the rest, it only causes unnecessary confusion.

31 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

My interest in IT and writing landed me in tech journalism early on (2000). I want to know how we can use technology without being used. Outside of the office, I’m a keen musician who makes up for lacking talent with excessive enthusiasm.


Background information

Interesting facts about products, behind-the-scenes looks at manufacturers and deep-dives on interesting people.

Show all