Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

Product test

Nokia 3.2 tested: This is how good the affordable smartphone is

Jan Johannsen
1.8.2019
Translation: machine translated

Cheap smartphones are getting better and better, but not all of them are good. That's why it's particularly important to scrutinise the devices. Find out here whether the Nokia 3.2 is worth buying.

The Nokia 3.2 is just one of three new affordable smartphones from HDM Global. These include the even cheaper Nokia 2.2 and the slightly more expensive Nokia 4.2, both of which can be inferred from the Nokia 3.2.

The red pen reigns

Speaking of slow. This also applies to the rest of the smartphone. The Snapdragon 429 chipset from Qualcomm and two gigabytes of RAM are enough to run almost all apps. But with this hardware, the Nokia 3.2 is noticeably slower than other smartphones. Even PUBG Mobile runs at the lowest graphics quality, but stutters constantly so that the game cannot be played properly.

Looking at the 6.26-inch display doesn't trigger any positive feelings either. The resolution of 1520 x 720 pixels is sufficient for a sharp image, but the colours appear dull - and the screen is not particularly bright either. This is particularly noticeable in the sunshine, as it is difficult to see anything on the highly reflective touchscreen.

And then there are only just over four gigabytes of the 16 gigabyte internal memory free immediately after starting up. With a few apps, Spotify downloads or photos, this will be full after a few months at the latest. Although you can expand the capacity with a microSD card, this should not be the case so soon.

A camera for good weather

The front camera has a resolution of five megapixels and gives your face a red tint. The level of detail is low, even for selfies, and the HDR effect only brings minor improvements.

Conclusion: Saving in the wrong places

The Nokia 3.2 doesn't convince me. Even if I give it credit for its low price, it offers too little storage space compared to other smartphones in this price range, hardware that is too slow, only a mediocre display and an average camera at best.

13 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

When I was but a young student, I'd sit in my friend's living room with all my classmates and play on his SuperNES. Since then I've had the opportunity to test out all the newest technology for you. I've done reviews at Curved, Computer Bild and Netzwelt, and have now arrived at Galaxus.de. 


Product test

Our experts test products and their applications. Independently and neutrally.

Show all

These articles might also interest you

  • Product test

    Nokia 1.3 tested: This is how good a very affordable smartphone is

    by Jan Johannsen

  • Product test

    Nokia X20 review: the allure of guaranteed updates

    by Jan Johannsen

  • Product test

    Nokia 9 Pureview test: five-camera smartphone with five-star pictures

    by Jan Johannsen