Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

Apple MagSafe Duo Charger (15 W)

Apple MagSafe Duo Charger

15 W


Question about Apple MagSafe Duo Charger

avatar
markbo2010

4 years ago

Abstract www.emf.ethz.ch ' 3_offer ' study_article Wireless charging For this report, wireless inductive charging stations for small electronic devices were investigated for their energy consumption and EMF emissions. Two technical standards exist, Qi and AirFuel. The first is dominant in the market. Wireless charging requires more energy than comparable wired charging. During active charging, the energy efficiency from the socket to the charging module of the end device is in the range of 50-60 %, while for wired charging it is around 75 %. In stand-by mode, wireless charging stations consume more energy than mains adapters left plugged in. Consumption is particularly high when the terminal is left on the console after charging. In the worst case, more is needed for stand-by operation than for charging the battery. Assuming 100 % penetration of the technology in the household sector, the annual additional electricity consumption of wireless charging compared to conventional charging would amount to about 30 GWh. Wired is more efficient. Eth Zurich is neutral. All those who do not care.

Avatar
avatar
Pascale

4 years ago

And what was the question to me? I am aware of what you mentioned, but it is a statement and not a question.