Hello, I installed the renegade and it works very well, nothing to say.

Differences:
Read speed and TBW
Fury 7300 MB/s and 2000 TBW
KC3000 7000 MB/s and 1600 TBW

The Fury reads minimally faster, but you would need data that is optimised exactly for that (for reading). But since we are all busy with documents, music, films or games, these 7000 or 7300 MB/s are never reached anyway. In my everyday life, I reach peaks of around 4000 MB/s with the Fury. The difference of 300 MB/s is absolutely negligible, you wouldn't even notice it in a direct comparison (except maybe in benchmarks, but that's not why you buy them as an Otto).
The real difference lies in the TBW, i.e. how much data can be written with the SSD before the first sectors fail (TBW = total bytes written). In this respect, you get more from the Fury than from the KC3000. You can completely rewrite the Fury every day for almost 3 years, whereas with the KC3000 it is "only" a good 2 years.

Hello, I use the Kingston FURY Renegade and the Kingston KC3000. The Renegade has a slightly higher reading speed than the KC3000. I am very satisfied with both models. I chose both because they were in action one after the other. Note, the 1TB variant of the KC3000 is slower. I would go for the Renegade.