No serious proponent of the biological perspective would deny the importance of culture for human behavior. And no serious advocate of the cultural studies perspective would deny the significance of evolution for human behavior. However, both tend to downplay the importance of the other side as quickly as possible in order to refocus entirely on their own perspective. For Karl Eibl, human cultural capability is not in opposition to biological endowment; rather, he understands it as a product of biological evolution. It is only the objectifying function of human language that allows us to refer to the non-present: to the past, the future, the absent, or even merely the invented. Furthermore, it enables the design of coherent personal worlds: intermediate worlds. Cultures are intermediate worlds.