Insolvency courts issue provisional measures on a daily basis, usually without providing detailed justifications. Furthermore, the prerequisites for such orders and the criteria guiding decisions are not immediately clear, leading to significant uncertainties for legal practitioners and those seeking justice. This is partly due to the fact that the procedural situation is not homogeneous but can vary greatly due to the multipolar nature of interests involved. Isabella Clemm develops a comprehensive doctrinal foundation for judicial decisions regarding provisional measures and systematizes the relevant temporal stage between crisis and insolvency based on types of proceedings. This results in a practically applicable model for the judicial ordering of provisional measures in insolvency proceedings.