The specs on digitec seem to be wrong, memory is wrong, processor on the 5g is wrong and I think camera specs are also wrong. Maybe they use a generic spec sheet and will be corrected closer to launch?
But if you google it, it already looks like it's a screen protector: https://www.spickipedia.com/index.php/samsung-galaxy-s20/schutzfolie-ab-werk-auf-dem-samsung-galaxy-s20-s20-oder-s20-ultra-vorhanden.html
This is indeed surprising. We would be happy to receive an e-mail about this. Please attach a photo. Helpcenter: https://helpcenter.digitec.ch/hc/fr / E-mail: https://helpcenter.digitec.ch/hc/fr/requests/new
Samsung Electronics GmbH
Hello,
The Galaxy S20 FE is well protected against water and dust with an IP68 certification: https://www.samsung.com/de/support/mobile-devices/was-bedeutet-die-ip68-zertifizierung-meines-samsung-produkts/
The smartphone is equipped with a 4500 mAh battery. Actual battery life may vary depending on network environment, user behaviour and other factors.
Best regards from Schwalbach,
Your Samsung Service Team
I would think twice, it's an expensive phone with old technology. Samsung offers 4 years of updates, but two of them are already over. There are much cheaper alternatives from other manufacturers that are new to the market and at the beginning of their life cycle. For example, a Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G would certainly be a very good device, it is very light, has a fast CPU, good battery life and gets 3 + 1 years of updates from the manufacturer. Maybe that would be an alternative to the Samsung?
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (8GB) (128 GB, Truffle Black, 6.55 ", Dual SIM, 64 Mpx, 5G)
Is a mistake in the data sheet at Digitec because ppi means pixel per inch you can also calculate it yourself 2400/6.5 gives about 400 you still have to subtract the edge