Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

Guide

Why mobile phone cameras are not already much better

David Lee
20.12.2018
Translation: machine translated

Smartphone manufacturers should build decent sensors into their cameras instead of putting more and more lenses on the back. This is a common demand. However, there are good reasons why this will not happen in the future.

In a recent article, fellow editor Dominik argued that it doesn't really matter how many cameras are on the back of your smartphone. Because the race is decided by the software.

In the comments to this article, user Tony s writes:

What an incredibly stupid trend. From a photographer's point of view... They should put fast lenses (f1.2 /1.4) and larger sensors (lower pixel density and therefore much less image noise) in the smartphones.
Tony s

Unfortunately, it's not that simple. But I believe this view is widespread. That's why I'd like to go into it in more detail.

And now to the more interesting point, namely the sensor size. Of course, a larger sensor would make many things better:

  • The pixels would be larger and more light-sensitive
  • This would result in less image noise
  • The camera would be able to depict greater differences in brightness.
  • With a really large sensor, the blurring could even occur naturally and would not have to be created by this artificial bokeh effect.

It is therefore understandable that photography enthusiasts are demanding larger sensors. Why aren't manufacturers listening to them?

The answer is simple: larger sensors are not physically possible.

Why a smartphone cannot have a large sensor

The sensor size must be in a sensible ratio to the focal length. This is because both factors, sensor size and focal length, have an effect on the image section.

  • The larger the sensor, the larger the image section (at the same focal length).
  • The longer the focal length, the smaller the image section (for the same sensor size).

If I now use a larger sensor, the image section becomes even larger. But I don't want that because it tends to be too large anyway.

I would therefore have to extend the focal length to get the same image section again. But that's not possible because the smartphone would have to be thicker. Or the smartphone camera would protrude significantly. Somehow, the distance between the sensor and the lens has to be increased. In any case, the result is a design that nobody wants on a smartphone.

A word on focal length specifications

We often read that the iPhone or Galaxy S9 have a focal length of 26 millimetres. This is wrong, these phones have a focal length of 4 millimetres. This 26 mm does not actually refer to the focal length, but rather the image section.

How thick a smartphone with a large sensor would be

The image section that we perceive as "normal", as natural, is 50 mm in 35 mm format. With a typical smartphone sensor, that would be 7 to 8 mm. You could perhaps just about tolerate that. If you are very tolerant.

If we now place the sensor of a compact camera such as the Sony RX100 in a smartphone, the focal length for this image section is 18.5 mm. The smartphone would have to be around two centimetres thick. With the typical smartphone wide-angle image section, it would still be one centimetre thick. At the very least.

Manufacturers such as Samsung, Nikon and Panasonic have already tried. The "smart camera" Panasonic Lumix DMC CM1 actually has a sensor as large as the Sony RX100. Unsurprisingly, with the protruding lens, the thing is just over two centimetres thick.

You can also think about it the other way round: Sony would certainly make its compact camera just a few millimetres thick if that were physically possible. They don't make things that thick just to annoy you.

Software and multiple cameras are a substitute

The fact that smartphone manufacturers are tinkering intensively with their camera software and have recently been putting more and more lenses on the back also has to do with the physical limits of the hardware. In other words, the companies need to change things where they can be changed.

Many software tricks have something to do with multiple shots in one form or another. Either several lenses take a picture at the same time, or the same lens takes several photos in quick succession. These almost identical images are then combined into a "master image". This allows weaknesses in the hardware to be masked.

Cover image: Adobe Stock/Dakota. His mobile would be thick enough, but who wants one of those these days?

57 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

My interest in IT and writing landed me in tech journalism early on (2000). I want to know how we can use technology without being used. Outside of the office, I’m a keen musician who makes up for lacking talent with excessive enthusiasm.


Guide

Practical solutions for everyday problems with technology, household hacks and much more.

Show all

These articles might also interest you

  • Guide

    These cameras can capture images before you’ve even finished clicking

    by David Lee

  • Guide

    Infrared photography through clothes: the physics behind it

    by David Lee

  • Guide

    Smartphone guide: Which one’s for you? Let’s find out.

    by Jan Johannsen